New Hampshire Attorneys Mcgrath Law Firm Concord NH

Efficiency, Excellence of Work Product, Zealous Representation

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Divorce & Family Law
    • Real Estate Law
    • Estate Planning Law
    • Business Law
    • Personal Injury Law
    • Criminal Defense Law
    • Civil Litigation
  • Meet Our Attorneys
    • Peter G. McGrath Attorney at law
    • Daniel J. Corley Attorney at Law
    • Tony Soltani Attorney at Law
    • Katherine Bucklin Stearns Attorney at Law
  • Legal Updates
  • Contact

Practice Areas

Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Complex Litigation
Civil Litigation
Real Estate Law
Business Law


Featured Posts

Homeowners Association Disputes: Navigate the Maze with McGrath Law Firm

MCGRATH LAW FIRM TO FILE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST EXETER HOSPITAL FOR INFECTING PATIENTS WITH THE HEPATITIS C VIRUS

June 15, 2012 By

CONCORD, NH

McGrath Law Firm, PA announces it will file a class action lawsuit against Exeter Hospital in Exeter, NH, for allegedly infecting approximately 20 patients with the Hepatitis C virus.

 

According to the complaint, Joe Doe was recently informed that he may have contracted Hepatitis C while in the exclusive care and custody of the Hospital.  Upon information and belief, an employee of the hospital contaminated the supplies used in intravenous care with the virus, which transmitted the infection to approximately twenty (20) patients.  Details are still being investigated.

Hepatitis C is an infection caused by a virus that attacks and inflames the liver. People infected with the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) have differing symptoms. Hepatitis C is generally considered to be one of the most serious of the hepatitis viruses.  It is contracted through contact with contaminated blood.  A Hepatitis C infection that continues over many years can cause significant complications, such as:

  • Scarring of the liver tissue (cirrhosis).
  • Liver cancer.
  • Liver failure.

In the State of New Hampshire, before anyone may proceed with a civil medical malpractice lawsuit, the complainant must appear before a screening panel.  The requirement of the screening panel review was implemented in 2007.

The screening panel is comprised of a retired judge, a health care provider, and an attorney.  The screening panel holds a hearing and listens to assertions from both sides.  The panel must make written findings within thirty (30) days after the hearing and must decide, based upon a preponderance of the evidence:

  1. Whether the acts or omissions complained of constitute a deviation from the applicable standard of care:  In August 2011 and at other times, John Doe was a patient at Exeter Hospital.  He was admitted a number of intravenous medical treatment procedures.  He was treated in the cardiac unit and in other units. He was allegedly unknowingly treated with contaminated needles in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Exeter Hospital;
  2. Whether the acts or omissions complained of directly, proximately, or foreseeably caused the injury complained of:  In June 2012, John Doe received a phone call from the Exeter Hospital informing him that he was one of the people that was allegedly infected with Hepatitis C.; and
  3. If fault on the part of the medical care provider is found, the panel determines whether any fault on the part of the patient was equal to or greater than the fault on the part of the provider: The Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Exeter Hospital is required to take proper maintenance, oversight, security and control of its cardiac units and other units. The hospital must maintain strict procedures to protect patients from infections and avoid transmission of infected blood. Upon information and belief, the security procedures, treatment requirements and oversight required did not take place at Exeter Hospital. Upon information and belief, the infection was caused by a hospital employee and should have been prevented by the Hospital.

According to the complaint, the law firm is seeking a class action suit and will ask the Court to allow similarly situated people, with similar injuries, to join the litigation.

In 2012, McGrath Law Firm was voted the Concord Monitor’s Capital Area People’s Preference award (CAPPIES) Best Law Firm.  In 2010, Peter G. McGrath and Daniel J. Corley were awarded the CAPPIES Best Attorney first and third placement.

Attorney McGrath is a former federal prosecutor and New Hampshire native.  He concentrates his practice in the areas of complex injury law, medical malpractice, business law, environmental law, real estate law, and general litigation matters. Attorney McGrath combines a unique and expansive background of litigation experience, both from the prosecutorial side and from the private sector. As a federal prosecutor with the United States Department of Justice, Attorney McGrath was the lead prosecutor for the government in several major federal cases, including several in New Hampshire. Attorney McGrath is the founding member of the McGrath Law Firm.

Attorney Corley began his legal career in New York City in a high profile international law firm protecting and acquiring major companies.  Attorney Corley served as a Court Attorney in the Civil Court of the City of New York assisting and advising judges, and acted as an advisor to Mayor Giuliani’s transition team.  Attorney Corley has practiced law for more than 20 years, specializing in a wide range of litigation and transactional matters. Licensed in both New Hampshire and New York, Attorney Corley received his undergraduate degree from Fordham College and attended Brooklyn Law School as well as Touro Law School where he received his Juris Doctor. In 2005, Attorney Corley moved to New Hampshire and joined McGrath Law Firm.

Filed Under: Legal Updates

MCGRATH LAW FIRM TO FILE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST EXETER HOSPITAL FOR INFECTING PATIENTS WITH THE HEPATITIS C VIRUS

June 15, 2012 By

CONCORD, NH

McGrath Law Firm, PA announces it will file a class action lawsuit against Exeter Hospital in Exeter, NH, for allegedly infecting approximately 20 patients with the Hepatitis C virus.

According to the complaint, Joe Doe was recently informed that he may have contracted Hepatitis C while in the exclusive care and custody of the Hospital.  Upon information and belief, an employee of the hospital contaminated the supplies used in intravenous care with the virus, which transmitted the infection to approximately twenty (20) patients.  Details are still being investigated.

Hepatitis C is an infection caused by a virus that attacks and inflames the liver. People infected with the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) have differing symptoms. Hepatitis C is generally considered to be one of the most serious of the hepatitis viruses.  It is contracted through contact with contaminated blood.  A Hepatitis C infection that continues over many years can cause significant complications, such as:

  • Scarring of the liver tissue (cirrhosis).
  • Liver cancer.
  • Liver failure.

In the State of New Hampshire, before anyone may proceed with a civil medical malpractice lawsuit, the complainant must appear before a screening panel.  The requirement of the screening panel review was implemented in 2007.

The screening panel is comprised of a retired judge, a health care provider, and an attorney.  The screening panel holds a hearing and listens to assertions from both sides.  The panel must make written findings within thirty (30) days after the hearing and must decide, based upon a preponderance of the evidence:

  1. Whether the acts or omissions complained of constitute a deviation from the applicable standard of care:  In August 2011 and at other times, John Doe was a patient at Exeter Hospital.  He was admitted a number of intravenous medical treatment procedures.  He was treated in the cardiac unit and in other units. He was allegedly unknowingly treated with contaminated needles in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Exeter Hospital;
  2. Whether the acts or omissions complained of directly, proximately, or foreseeably caused the injury complained of:  In June 2012, John Doe received a phone call from the Exeter Hospital informing him that he was one of the people that was allegedly infected with Hepatitis C.; and
  3. If fault on the part of the medical care provider is found, the panel determines whether any fault on the part of the patient was equal to or greater than the fault on the part of the provider: The Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Exeter Hospital is required to take proper maintenance, oversight, security and control of its cardiac units and other units. The hospital must maintain strict procedures to protect patients from infections and avoid transmission of infected blood. Upon information and belief, the security procedures, treatment requirements and oversight required did not take place at Exeter Hospital. Upon information and belief, the infection was caused by a hospital employee and should have been prevented by the Hospital.

According to the complaint, the law firm is seeking a class action suit and will ask the Court to allow similarly situated people, with similar injuries, to join the litigation.

In 2012, McGrath Law Firm was voted the Concord Monitor’s Capital Area People’s Preference award (CAPPIES) Best Law Firm.  In 2010, Peter G. McGrath and Daniel J. Corley were awarded the CAPPIES Best Attorney first and third placement.

Attorney McGrath is a former federal prosecutor and New Hampshire native.  He concentrates his practice in the areas of complex injury law, medical malpractice, business law, environmental law, real estate law, and general litigation matters. Attorney McGrath combines a unique and expansive background of litigation experience, both from the prosecutorial side and from the private sector. As a federal prosecutor with the United States Department of Justice, Attorney McGrath was the lead prosecutor for the government in several major federal cases, including several in New Hampshire. Attorney McGrath is the founding member of the McGrath Law Firm.

Attorney Corley began his legal career in New York City in a high profile international law firm protecting and acquiring major companies.  Attorney Corley served as a Court Attorney in the Civil Court of the City of New York assisting and advising judges, and acted as an advisor to Mayor Giuliani’s transition team.  Attorney Corley has practiced law for more than 20 years, specializing in a wide range of litigation and transactional matters. Licensed in both New Hampshire and New York, Attorney Corley received his undergraduate degree from Fordham College and attended Brooklyn Law School as well as Touro Law School where he received his Juris Doctor. In 2005, Attorney Corley moved to New Hampshire and joined McGrath Law Firm.

Filed Under: Legal Updates

MCGRATH LAW FIRM TO FILE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST EXETER HOSPITAL FOR INFECTING PATIENTS WITH THE HEPATITIS C VIRUS

June 15, 2012 By

CONCORD, NH

McGrath Law Firm, PA announces it will file a class action lawsuit against Exeter Hospital in Exeter, NH, for allegedly infecting approximately 20 patients with the Hepatitis C virus.

According to the complaint, Joe Doe was recently informed that he may have contracted Hepatitis C while in the exclusive care and custody of the Hospital.  Upon information and belief, an employee of the hospital contaminated the supplies used in intravenous care with the virus, which transmitted the infection to approximately twenty (20) patients.  Details are still being investigated.

Hepatitis C is an infection caused by a virus that attacks and inflames the liver. People infected with the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) have differing symptoms. Hepatitis C is generally considered to be one of the most serious of the hepatitis viruses.  It is contracted through contact with contaminated blood.  A Hepatitis C infection that continues over many years can cause significant complications, such as:

  • Scarring of the liver tissue (cirrhosis).
  • Liver cancer.
  • Liver failure.

In the State of New Hampshire, before anyone may proceed with a civil medical malpractice lawsuit, the complainant must appear before a screening panel.  The requirement of the screening panel review was implemented in 2007.

The screening panel is comprised of a retired judge, a health care provider, and an attorney.  The screening panel holds a hearing and listens to assertions from both sides.  The panel must make written findings within thirty (30) days after the hearing and must decide, based upon a preponderance of the evidence:

  1. Whether the acts or omissions complained of constitute a deviation from the applicable standard of care:  In August 2011 and at other times, John Doe was a patient at Exeter Hospital.  He was admitted a number of intravenous medical treatment procedures.  He was treated in the cardiac unit and in other units. He was allegedly unknowingly treated with contaminated needles in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Exeter Hospital;
  2. Whether the acts or omissions complained of directly, proximately, or foreseeably caused the injury complained of:  In June 2012, John Doe received a phone call from the Exeter Hospital informing him that he was one of the people that was allegedly infected with Hepatitis C.; and
  1. If fault on the part of the medical care provider is found, the panel determines whether any fault on the part of the patient was equal to or greater than the fault on the part of the provider: The Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Exeter Hospital is required to take proper maintenance, oversight, security and control of its cardiac units and other units. The hospital must maintain strict procedures to protect patients from infections and avoid transmission of infected blood. Upon information and belief, the security procedures, treatment requirements and oversight required did not take place at Exeter Hospital. Upon information and belief, the infection was caused by a hospital employee and should have been prevented by the Hospital.

 

According to the complaint, the law firm is seeking a class action suit and will ask the Court to allow similarly situated people, with similar injuries, to join the litigation.

 

In 2012, McGrath Law Firm was voted the Concord Monitor’s Capital Area People’s Preference award (CAPPIES) Best Law Firm.  In 2010, Peter G. McGrath and Daniel J. Corley were awarded the CAPPIES Best Attorney first and third placement.

 

 

Attorney McGrath is a former federal prosecutor and New Hampshire native.  He concentrates his practice in the areas of complex injury law, medical malpractice, business law, environmental law, real estate law, and general litigation matters. Attorney McGrath combines a unique and expansive background of litigation experience, both from the prosecutorial side and from the private sector. As a federal prosecutor with the United States Department of Justice, Attorney McGrath was the lead prosecutor for the government in several major federal cases, including several in New Hampshire. Attorney McGrath is the founding member of the McGrath Law Firm.

 

Attorney Corley began his legal career in New York City in a high profile international law firm protecting and acquiring major companies.  Attorney Corley served as a Court Attorney in the Civil Court of the City of New York assisting and advising judges, and acted as an advisor to Mayor Giuliani’s transition team.  Attorney Corley has practiced law for more than 20 years, specializing in a wide range of litigation and transactional matters. Licensed in both New Hampshire and New York, Attorney Corley received his undergraduate degree from Fordham College and attended Brooklyn Law School as well as Touro Law School where he received his Juris Doctor. In 2005, Attorney Corley moved to New Hampshire and joined McGrath Law Firm.

Filed Under: Legal Updates

1.6 million awarded after trial

March 15, 2012 By

In September 2011 trial attorney Daniel Corley of McGrath Law Firm represented a real estate investor in litigation involving debts owed on real estate transactions. Client was awarded a judgment after trial in the amount of $1,628,867.00 plus statutory interest in the amount of $52,230.00 and attorney’s fees in the amount of $13,851.00 for a total of $1,694,948.88.
This case involves unique circumstances. In 2009 the United States Bankruptcy Court issued a default judgment on three separate debts owed by the Defendants to Plaintiff and found that the debts were not dischargeable. That the Plaintiff brought an action to enforce the judgment in the Superior Court of New Hampshire. The Bankruptcy Court entered the judgements as a result of the debtors’ failure to comply with Court Orders and appear at scheduled hearings. The issue before the Superior Court was whether or not the Superior Court had the jurisdiction to enforce the Bankruptcy Court Default Judgment. It was determined that the Superior Court had the ability to enforce the default judgment on liability only, i.e., that the Defendants were responsible for the debts. The Superior Court then set the matter down for a trial on damages. That after hearing testimony, and evidence, damages were awarded to the Plaintiff.

Filed Under: Legal Updates

1.6 million awarded after trial

March 15, 2012 By

In September 2011 trial attorney Daniel Corley of McGrath Law Firm represented a real estate investor in litigation involving debts owed on real estate transactions. Client was awarded a judgment after trial in the amount of $1,628,867.00 plus statutory interest in the amount of $52,230.00 and attorney’s fees in the amount of $13,851.00 for a total of $1,694,948.88.

This case involves unique circumstances. In 2009 the United States Bankruptcy Court issued a default judgment on three separate debts owed by the Defendants to Plaintiff and found that the debts were not dischargeable. That the Plaintiff brought an action to enforce the judgment in the Superior Court of New Hampshire. The Bankruptcy Court entered the judgements as a result of the debtors’ failure to comply with Court Orders and appear at scheduled hearings. The issue before the Superior Court was whether or not the Superior Court had the jurisdiction to enforce the Bankruptcy Court Default Judgment. It was determined that the Superior Court had the ability to enforce the default judgment on liability only, i.e., that the Defendants were responsible for the debts. The Superior Court then set the matter down for a trial on damages. That after hearing testimony, and evidence, damages were awarded to the Plaintiff.  

Filed Under: Legal Updates

Contact the McGrath Law Firm

February 16, 2012 By

Contact Information & Directions

Evening and Weekend Appointments Available upon request

1-800-283-1380
Merrimack County – (603) 224-7111
Rockingham County – (603) 432-6819

Facsimile: (603) 228-8095

20 Montgomery Street
Concord, New Hampshire 03301

Send us an email by clicking HERE

Filed Under: Legal Updates

About McGrath Law Firm

February 16, 2012 By

The McGrath Law Firm is a full-service law firm dedicated to providing zealous representation of its clients throughout New Hampshire. Client satisfaction is the number one goal of the McGrath Law Firm, and we strive to reach this goal by following three fundamental principles:
Efficiency

We take pride in tailoring the most effective yet cost-conscious legal solutions for our clients. The most important aspect of our business is stewardship to our clients, and we strive to completely understand our clients’ needs in order to develop a “partnership” into the future.

Excellence of Work Product

Regardless of the practice area, every matter brought to an attorney requires a certain knowledge base, experience, and strategy. With our broad range of targeted services and dedication to the legal profession, our goal is to provide the highest quality of legal services through written word, oral argumentation, or other avenues of representation.

Zealous Representation

We will make every reasonable attempt to resolve your legal issues through negotiation and other litigation alternatives. However, we realize that this is not possible in every case, and in these situations, we are prepared to zealously litigate your case before a judge and jury.

We invite you to continue browsing our website for additional details on our firm and practice areas.

Filed Under: Legal Updates

blog_header.jpg

February 16, 2012 By

https://mcgrathlawfirm.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/blog_header.jpg

Filed Under: Legal Updates

Sample Page

February 15, 2012 By

This is an example page. It’s different from a blog post because it will stay in one place and will show up in your site navigation (in most themes). Most people start with an About page that introduces them to potential site visitors. It might say something like this:

Hi there! I’m a bike messenger by day, aspiring actor by night, and this is my blog. I live in Los Angeles, have a great dog named Jack, and I like piña coladas. (And gettin’ caught in the rain.)

…or something like this:

The XYZ Doohickey Company was founded in 1971, and has been providing quality doohickies to the public ever since. Located in Gotham City, XYZ employs over 2,000 people and does all kinds of awesome things for the Gotham community.

As a new WordPress user, you should go to your dashboard to delete this page and create new pages for your content. Have fun!

Filed Under: Legal Updates

Hello world!

February 15, 2012 By

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Filed Under: Legal Updates

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Practice Areas

  • Divorce & Family Law
  • Criminal Defense
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Civil Litigation
  • Real Estate Law
  • Business Law
  • Estate Planning Law

Sign Up For McGrath Law Firm Newsletter

Download Our Newsletter

Featured Posts

Homeowners Association Disputes: Navigate the Maze with McGrath Law Firm

Why You Need to Have a Will and Estate Plan in Place at a Younger Age

Our Story

Practice Areas

Divorce and Family Law
Probate Matters
Civil Litigation
Mediation
Collaborative Law Practice
Consultations

EDUCATION
Boston College Law School, J.D.
Harvard University, M.A.
Emmanuel College, B.A.

ADMISSIONS
New Hampshire
Massachusetts
US District Court, New Hampshire
US District Court, Massachusetts

AFFILIATIONS
Collaborative Law Alliance of
New Hampshire (CLANH)
International Academy of Collaborative
Professionals (IACP)
NH Bar Association:
Alternative Dispute Resolution Section
Family Law Section

Practice Areas

Divorce and Family Law
Criminal Defense
Personal Injury
Civil Litigation
Real Estate Law
Business Law


Featured Posts

Homeowners Association Disputes: Navigate the Maze with McGrath Law Firm

Back to Top

Copyright © 2026 McGrath Law Firm Concord NH | Visit South Carolina site


McGrath Law Firm, PA presents the content of this website for informational purposes only. The contents may not reflect the most current legal developments and may not indicate future results. The contents of this website should not be construed as legal advice. McGrath Law Firm does not intend that delivery of this material, receipt of this material, or inquiry emails create any attorney-client relationship. You should not make decisions based upon this information without consulting an attorney. McGrath Law Firm is not responsible for and does not necessarily approve of the materials contained on linked websites.